Through the listening to, The Verge reported that many involved residents took the chance to stipulate why they consider self-driving taxis are dangerous for San Franciso. A recurring sentiment was that the town doesn’t want extra vehicles on the street. It is onerous to fault their issues, as San Francisco is already one of the vital congested cities on this planet. Additionally they identified that these automated vehicles can cease in the course of intersections resulting from errors, inflicting extra visitors slowdowns.
Main as much as the vote, some metropolis officers sought to delay the listening to due to the various incidents of autonomous automobiles blocking emergency automobiles. Jeanine Nicholson, chief of the San Francisco Hearth Division, advised the Washington Submit that there have been 66 incidents logged by the fireplace division of self-driving vehicles interfering with emergency operations. This contains blocking fireplace engines and inserting themselves into areas the place stay fires have been blazing.
In response to those issues, fee president Alice Busching Reynolds acknowledged, “We do anticipate the AV corporations to interact with first responders, with regulation enforcement, with metropolis officers, and we do anticipate actions to deal with issues.”
The CPUC defined that the self-driving automotive corporations have met all of the state’s regulatory framework obligations. That mentioned, commissioner Darcie Houck famous that if extra incidents happen, the CPUC might vote to limit or revoke the businesses’ newly obtained licenses.