The first concern relating to the acquisition was that Microsoft might leverage its strengthened portfolio of Activision video games to realize an unfair edge available in the market by limiting them to its Xbox platform, each on consoles and the cloud gaming phase. Microsoft shortly moved to allay a few of these considerations, inking a take care of Nintendo to supply “Name of Obligation” — one of many greatest gaming franchises on the market — on the Swap and future platforms for 10 years. To reply considerations about cloud gaming dominance, Microsoft additionally signed the same take care of Nvidia to maintain the franchise on its cloud-based recreation streaming platform which competes with Microsoft’s personal Xbox-branded recreation streaming service.
Sony, nevertheless, was reluctant to take the deal and was additionally one of many greatest opponents of the merger with the way forward for PlayStation at stake. Nevertheless, Sony additionally accepted the “Name of Obligation” supply in July 2023. Whereas the U.S. antitrust regulators had been extra involved with the console and PC-based gaming market, the U.Ok.’s competitors watchdog has strongly targeted on the cloud gaming panorama, too.
However given the extraordinarily small share of cloud gaming within the bigger image of the acquisition’s fast after-effects, it might be simpler for Microsoft to persuade the CMA on statistical grounds, as nicely. Microsoft is but to challenge a press release on the newest FTC resolution to withdraw its in-house trial, however it seems that the most important gaming trade acquisition ever is nearing completion by the top of this yr.