At the start, the FF 91 does not actually match into any present classification of auto. It is not an SUV. It is technically a sedan, based on the EPA classification, and may be construed as a wagon. That is not notably unusual, because the Polestar 4 does not experience alongside any present design conventions. The wrinkle comes with how Faraday Future describes it. Based on the corporate, it is a “Magic All-in-One”: as quick as a hypercar, as comfy as a sedan, and providing the experience peak of an SUV.
The problem is made even much less clear once you see the autos it’s in contrast in opposition to. Faraday Future contrasts its automotive to the Ferrari SF90 Stradale, the Mercedes-Maybach EQS, the Mercedes-Maybach S 680, and the Rolls-Royce Spectre. Except for the EQS and S 680 originating from Mercedes, none of these 4 autos have something to do with one another, and two of them — the SF90 and the S 680 — aren’t even EVs. This may be like Tesla evaluating its Mannequin S to a Ford Expedition. The one similarity these two autos share are 4 wheels and a windshield.
Faraday Future headlines this comparability with the phrase “Even elephants can dance the last word dance.” It is a pretty indecipherable mixture of phrases, although does suggest the automaker thinks its new EV is an elephant.